Razer is identified for making premium notebooks supposed for gaming on the stagger, but which can also also be outmoded as a inventive workstation. We compare Razer’s Blade Stealth 13 against Apple’s 2020 13-stagger MacBook Pro to safe out which is the higher compact powerhouse.
Razer was once the principle of the 2 firms to approach up with a recent 13-stagger notebook, with an up to this level Blade Stealth 13 launched in dull April, roughly two weeks earlier than Apple launched the refreshed 13-stagger MacBook Pro differ. The update, itself a refresh of the strengthen made in early 2019, made changes to the GPU and processor selection.
There are a colorful few similarities between the competing notebooks, such as promising excessive performance in a diminutive and thin salvage, paired with a excessive-quality word and an enduring battery.
Undoubtedly, while Apple leans its promotion in direction of legit and ingenious utilization, Razer goes for the gamer market, which makes sense furious by its accessory heritage. Even so, the performance claims for gaming aloof makes the Razer notebook rather radiant to energy users.
There are also a few bells and whistles that Razer throws in that Apple does no longer offer, such as RGB backlighting for the keyboard and a 4K touchscreen, but this comparability is extra about your total package deal.
|Razer Blade Stealth 13||13-stagger MacBook Pro (2020), Two Thunderbolt Ports||13-stagger MacBook Pro (2020), Four Thunderbolt Ports|
|Starting up Tag||$1,299.99||$1,299
Lowest 13″ MacBook Pro prices
Easiest deals on 10th Gen devices
|Dimensions (inches)||0.60 x 11.99 x 8.27||0.61 x 11.97 x 8.36||0.61 x 11.97 x 8.36|
|Weight (pounds)||3.1, 3.26||3.1||3.1|
|Processor||10th-technology 1.3GHz quad-core Intel Core i7,
eighth-technology 1.8GHz quad-core Intel Core i7
|eighth-technology 1.4GHz quad-core Intel Core i5
eighth-technology 1.7GHz quad-core Intel Core i7
|10th-technology 2.0GHz quad-core Intel Core i5
10th-technology 2.3GHz quad-core Intel Core i7
|Graphics||Intel Iris Plus Graphics,
Nvidia GeForce MX150,
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650,
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
|Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645||Intel Iris Plus Graphics|
|RAM||16GB||8GB or 16GB||16GB or 32GB|
|Storage||256GB or 512GB||512GB, 1TB or 2TB||512GB, 1TB, 2TB or 4TB|
|Present||13.3-stagger 1920×1080 Matte, 120Hz option,
13.3-stagger 3840×2160 touchscreen
|13.3-stagger 2560×1600 LCD with IPS||13.3-stagger 2560×1600 LCD with IPS|
USB-C 3.1 Gen 2
Two USB 3.1 Form-A ports
3.5mm headphone jack
|Two Thunderbolt 3 ports
3.5mm headphone jack
|Four Thunderbolt 3 ports
3.5mm headphone jack
|Biometrics||Windows Howdy||Contact ID||Contact ID|
|Battery||53.1Wh, Up to 11 hours of utilization||58.2Wh, Up to 10 hours of web browsing||58.0Wh, Up to 10 hours of web browsing|
Razer Blade Stealth 13 vs 13-stagger MacBook Pro – Displays
The most glaring starting level of comparability for the 2 product lines is the demonstrate. Each and each Apple and Razer equip their respective notebooks with a 13.3-stagger masks, but that is where the similarities pause.
Apple is continuous to make expend of a 13.3-stagger LED-backlit IPS demonstrate, particular person that provides a 2,560-by-1,600 resolution alongside with huge coloration P3 strengthen, True Tone, and 500 nits of brightness. It is a correctly-tested and enough word for the overwhelming majority of its users.
For the Blade Stealth 13, there are two displays on hand as half of a configuration.
The lower-tier masks is a 13.3-stagger panel, including a variant with a 120Hz refresh rate, declared the realm’s fastest 13.3-stagger model and particular person that would possibly perhaps support form textual remark more straightforward to read and originate crisp gameplay visuals. The utilization of a 1,920-by-1,080 resolution, the masks is no longer as correct as the one outmoded in the MacBook Pro in terms of how powerful it’ll demonstrate in the present day, but it absolutely does possess a matte coating for improved glare reduction and covers 100% of the sRGB keep.
The elevated-tier variant is an identical dimension, but as an substitute is a 4K panel providing a resolution of three,840 by 2,160. With the same 100% sRGB coverage, the masks will be contact-enabled, giving an alternative choice to trackpad or mouse inputs.
For this technology, Razer has up to this level the create of the displays to possess a truly slim bezel measuring 4.9mm, no topic the resolution. Nonetheless, this dimension handiest actually applies on the edges, as the pause bezel is a diminutive thicker to house a webcam, and there is a substantial half of blank keep below the demonstrate.
There’ll not be this kind of thing as a amble winner on this entrance, as the MacBook Pro’s demonstrate sits between the 2 Blade strategies in terms of resolution. Razer can also fair capture for its 4K touchscreen, however the plump HD lower-resolution option on the more inexpensive pause of the differ is a diminutive bit bit of a letdown.
Razer Blade Stealth 13 vs 13-stagger MacBook Pro – Size and Weight
As is to be expected, there is terribly diminutive in it at the same time as you occur to test the physicality of the notebooks. For a birth, the 13-stagger MacBook Pro is 0.61 inches thick, while the Blade is barely any thinner at 0.60 inches.
The total footprint will be rather identical, with Razer going for a slightly longer create at 11.99 inches versus 11.97 inches for Apple, and narrower at 8.27 inches to 8.36 inches. On condition that we must stagger all of the vogue down to hundredths-of-an-stagger differences in dimension, width, and thickness, that is all rather negligible.
It is a familiar myth for weight, as they are all 3.1 pounds apiece, no longer less than for the Plump HD model of the Blade Stealth 13. Any individual upgrading to the 4K touchscreen will watch their notebook establish weight to a aloof-manageable 3.26 pounds.
Nonetheless you lower it, there is barely any precise-world distinction in the bodily properties. Definite, the 4K Razer is a diminutive bit heavier, but otherwise it is very toe-to-toe.
Razer Blade Stealth 13 vs 13-stagger MacBook Pro – Processors and Memory
When Apple launched its up to this level 13-stagger MacBook Pro, the mountainous myth surrounding it was once how it made upgrades to the processor lineup for its upper-tier configurations, while conserving its lower-tier devices on older processor generations.
The upper-level variations expend 10th-technology quad-core Intel Core i5-1038NG7 2.0Ghz and Core i7-1068NG7 2.3GHz processors, with respective Turbo Enhance speeds of three.8Ghz and 4.1GHz. On the lower pause are the eighth-technology quad-core Intel Core i5-8257U 1.4Ghz and Core i7-8557U 1.7GHz processors, with boosted clock speeds of three.9GHz and 4.5GHz.
Even though the clock speeds can also fair suggest the chips eager are considerably comparable, the generational distinction between the 2 items also equates to a performance distinction, both in processing and in energy consumption. In total talking, the later-technology chips are going to offer higher performance than equivalents for older generations.
The generational divide also extends to memory, with the eighth-technology paired with 2,133MHz LPDDR3 memory that begins at 8GB and would possibly perhaps presumably fair additionally be upgraded to 16GB. The 10th-technology devices as an substitute possess 16GB of three,733MHz LPDDR4X memory, with that it’s also possible to mediate of configuration upgrades to 32GB.
Surprisingly, while Apple’s opponents on the total offer extra differ of their processors and memory, Razer does no longer. The Blade Stealth 13 has the same tenth-technology Core i7-1065G7 processor, clocked at 1.3GHz with a 3.9GHz Turbo Enhance, and 16 gigabytes of three,733MHz LPDDR4X memory with no contrivance to add extra.
The exception is for one model that has an eighth-technology Intel Core i7-8565U, a quad-core chip with imperfect and boosted clocks of 1.8GHz and 4.6GHz. Out of doors of one particular configuration, there is no contrivance to invent this older processor.
Razer’s major processor substitute sits someplace between the 2 elevated-tier MacBook Pro chips for its height performance. Its major support is its 1.3GHz clock accelerate when unboosted, which can support decrease energy consumption when performance is no longer at all times actually wished.
An additional support is thermal, as Apple’s choices possess a TDP of 28 watts. In most cases, Razer’s processor has a default TDP of 15 watts, but it absolutely went with the elevated 25-watt configuration which allows for longer sustained boosted clock speeds.
Neither the processor nor RAM are replaceable in any of the notebooks in this comparability. In all cases, no topic the buyer orders to begin with is what they possess to are living with till they replace the notebook with a more contemporary model.
Razer Blade Stealth 13 vs 13-stagger MacBook Pro – Graphics
Reckoning on the processor outmoded, the 13-stagger MacBook Pro has either Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645, or on the elevated-tier model, Intel Iris Plus Graphics. These are integrated graphics strategies, which attain no longer expend a separate discrete GPU.
The Razer Blade Stealth 13 demonstrate is supplied in Plump HD and 4K contact-enabled forms.
On the Razer aspect, the imperfect configuration has the same Intel Iris Plus Graphics as Apple’s 10th-technology variants. Nonetheless, Razer also offers a substitute of discrete graphics strategies, which stand to offer higher performance.
The bottom discrete GPU selection is the Nvidia GeForce MX150, a holdover from the outdated model, while at the pause pause are the GeForce GTX 1650 and the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti. That supreme option has 4GB of GDDR6 VRAM and Nvidia’s Max-Q Catch, and is equipped with 1,024 Nvidia Cuda Cores that would possibly perhaps presumably additionally be employed in some applications like video modifying and graphic create.
A search of PassMark’s GPU benchmark outcomes checklist indicates Intel Iris Plus Graphics GPUs possess a G3D Mark receive of 1,843 and G2D Mark receive of 310. Nvidia’s lowest discrete GPU option, the MX150, with out recount beats that on G3D place with 2,370, but dips in the support of on G2D with 226 factors.
On the GeForce GTX 1650, the mobile Max-Q Catch model of the GPU performs considerably higher at 5,951 and 295 for G3D and G2D respectively. Lastly and oddly, the Ti model offers rankings of 5,336 and 253 on the benchmark checklist, fair below but all throughout the same ballpark of the non-Ti.
Even with the receive oddity, it is extremely glaring that the discrete GPU variations of Razer’s notebooks can attain powerful higher graphics-wise, and no longer less than equate the MacBook Pro at the low pause.
Razer Blade Stealth 13 vs 13-stagger MacBook Pro – Connectivity
Wi-fi connectivity on the 13-stagger MacBook Pro is noteworthy, with 802.11ac Wi-Fi and Bluetooth 5.0 supported, but Razer edges it out with Bluetooth 5.1 and Wi-Fi 6, otherwise identified as 802.11ax. Not less than on the wi-fi entrance, Razer takes the lead.
For ports, Apple has either two or four Thunderbolt 3 ports, reckoning on the tier of MacBook Pro, and the ever demonstrate headphone jack. The Blade Stealth 13 as an substitute has one Thunderbolt 3 port, one USB-C port, two veteran USB 3.1 Form-A ports, and again the headphone jack.
It appears likely that Razer regarded as its users to aloof want the older-vogue USB connections, partly to avoid wasting from having to make expend of dongles or adapters as with the MacBook Pro. Even though this can also fair seem like helping users, it does mean the MacBook Pro offers connections with a elevated recordsdata throughput collectively, as correctly as being considerably extra future-proofed.
Razer Blade Stealth 13 vs 13-stagger MacBook Pro – Other Specifications
Storage strategies on the MacBook Pro are extra huge-ranging at the time of configuration, with devices starting with either 256GB, 512GB, or 1TB SSDs, and with upgrades to up to 2TB or 4TB on hand reckoning on the model. Razer offers 256GB for the integrated-handiest GPU and MX150, or 512GB on the GTX GPUs.
Whereas Razer does no longer possess the differ of storage capacities that Apple offers, the Blade Stealth 13 is nonetheless in a keep to be upgraded with replacement storage, by ability of an M.2 slot. As opposed to storage, there are no other after-sale strengthen strategies on any of the when compared notebooks.
Each and each the 13-stagger MacBook Pro and the Razer Blade Stealth 13 possess backlit keyboards, but Razer opts to consist of customizable RGB lighting fixtures.
Apple comprises the elevated-ability battery at 58.2-watt-hours against 53.1-watt-hours. The MacBook Pro offers up to 10 hours of battery existence for web browsing, while Razer claims between 8 hours and 11 hours, reckoning on the model.
Razer has the next charging residing by including a 100-watt USB-C energy adapter when compared with Apple’s 61-watt model, in half on account of it being in a keep to recharge its battery at a faster rate, as correctly as seeing less degradation of the recharging time when it is in active expend. It can presumably presumably also be extra beneficial as a USB-C charger for other hardware, as the 100 watts will let it strengthen devices that would possibly perhaps attain that level, unlike Apple’s lower-wattage model.
The MacBook Pro advantages from Contact ID for biometric security, while the Blade Stealth 13 makes expend of Windows Howdy, though the webcam strategies a constructed-in IR sensor to reduction with the feature. Each and each Apple and Razer expend 720p webcams.
The Magic Keyboard on the MacBook Pro is backlit, however the Blade Stealth 13 goes extra in providing plump RGB backlighting to 16.8 million colors, that would possibly perhaps presumably additionally be space to commerce in a differ of utterly different patterns.
Apple comprises stereo audio system with Dolby Atmos strengthen in the 13-stagger MacBook Pro, and a three-mic array with directional beamforming. Razer comprises four upward-firing stereo audio system, a orderly amplifier, Dolby Atmos strengthen, and an array microphone.
Razer Blade Stealth 13 vs 13-stagger MacBook Pro – Pricing
There are rather a lot of additional strategies for clients to be occupied with if they had been to invent a MacBook Pro. Apple begins with four imperfect model configurations, with every in a keep to be upgraded with higher substances.
The lower-tier devices birth with the $1,299 option, with the eighth-technology Core i5, 256GB SSD, and 8GB of RAM, while $1,499 merely makes the storage 512GB in ability. Upgrading to the eighth-technology Core i7 is $300 extra, while 16GB of RAM is $200.
The 10th-technology processor devices birth at $1,799 with the Core i5, 16GB of memory and a 512GB SSD, while $1,999 brings you up to 1 terabyte. Switching to the Core i7 processor is $200 extra, and it is $400 to salvage to 32GB of memory.
Razer offers a few coloration adaptations, including unlit, white, and ‘Quartz Pink’
On the Razer aspect, the distinction in model largely depends on the graphics card, and with very few adaptations on hand.
The bottom model has integrated graphics, the Plump HD masks, a 256GB SSD, and a Mercury White paint job for $1,299.99. Choosing the GeForce MX150 costs the same amount of money, but makes expend of the older eighth-gen Core i7 and is finished in Quartz Pink.
At $1,399.99, the GeForce GTX 1650 model is in unlit and has a 512GB SSD alongside with a Plump HD masks, though going for the 4K Contact model brings it up to $1,799.99.
Lastly, the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti model has 512GB of storage and either the Plump HD 120Hz masks for $1,799.99, or the 4K Contact substitute for $1,999.99.
Brooding about that most of the Razer notebooks possess discrete graphics, this does suggest that the Blade Stealth 13 differ is rather competitively priced when keep against the 13-stagger MacBook Pro with identical memory and storage strategies.
Performance is Almost Every thing
When Apple launched the contemporary 13-stagger MacBook Pro devices, the variations with the 10th-technology Intel processors supplied the product line with a hefty strengthen in terms of performance. It is rather evident that correct on the processor, the Blade Stealth 13 differ can absolutely withhold its obtain against those upper devices, no longer less than with comparable portions of RAM.
Not less than that is correct in terms of raw processing energy. By merely adding strategies for discrete graphics, Razer in the present day adds extra model to its lineup on account of the ability extra performance it’ll bring to the table.
Apple does claw support some factors for giving extra strategies, as even basically the most hardcore gamer can also fair safe the 512GB SSD quite limiting on the Blade. Even so, the Blade is no longer less than in a keep to be upgraded with extra storage, so while Apple does offer extra storage substitute from the outset, you are caught with it whereas it’s also possible to very correctly be no longer with Razer’s notebook.
There is also the extra diminutive things the Blade has, such as the elevated 4K demonstrate with contact capabilities, as correctly as the extra radiant backlighting that can form it extra visually appealing to a definite target audience.
Undoubtedly, there is the dependency on having to make expend of Windows at the same time as you stagger for the Blade, an working system that would possibly presumably presumably be flee alongside macOS, a mighty support for the MacBook Pro that Razer correct does no longer possess.
Razer’s Blade Stealth 13 absolutely stands up against Apple’s 13-stagger MacBook Pro, but though there are some areas where it is realized a diminutive bit missing, it sure makes up for it with the discrete graphics and comparable pricing.
Wanting procuring an external GPU enclosure, you are doubtlessly no longer going to seek the same performance on the 13-stagger MacBook Pro as the Blade Stealth 13 till Apple’s next revision.